http://truthufo.blogspot.com/: IF THE REAL UFOs ARE NOT THEY SHOULD NOT PRODUCE PHYSICAL EFFECTS OF REAL?

Monday, 25 August 2008

IF THE REAL UFOs ARE NOT THEY SHOULD NOT PRODUCE PHYSICAL EFFECTS OF REAL?

Again, the answer is that they do. There are cases fairly well authenticated covering a wide range "of physical effects." "Car stops are an important class. The UFOs were repeatedly associated with failures of ignition and lighting cars and trucks that came around UFOs or who have been approached by a UFO movements. I think we could assemble a list of four or five dozen such examples from various regions of the world. The interference with radio and TV receivers have been reported many times in conjunction with observations of UFOs. There are examples where UFOs were reported to have landed, and after their departure, holes in the ground, or depressions in the grass or disturbance of vegetation have been described. In many such examples, the obvious reliability of witnesses is high, the probability of hoax or artifice is low. A limited number of examples of residue left are known, but they are not supported by laboratory tests significant, unfortunately.

A physical effect that does not typically occur in conditions where the description of events could appear to be that of supersonic bangs. Although there are a few cases where rapid UFOs have been accompanied by noises explosives that could be associated with supersonic bangs, there are many more examples in which the speed reported corresponded to supersonic speeds, yet no bang has been reported. A small fraction of them can be rationalized by noting that witnesses were located behind a "cone of Mach" UFO crossing, but this will not suffice to eliminate the difficulty. It is estimated that if UFOs are solid objects that can leave depressions in the ground or in the tie railway when they land and are rushing out of sight in a few seconds (as has been repeatedly affirmed by credible witnesses), they should produce supersonic bangs. This is inexplicable and can only speculate unnecessarily there may be ways of eliminating sonic booms that we have not yet discovered, perhaps the answer involves considerations entirely different.

If we include among "the physical effects" those relating to physiology, then there seems to be a lot of strange cases. On several occasions, dizziness and numbness were described by witnesses who were near UFOs, in many cases, the paralysis of a witness pure UFO occurred. These effects could, of course, be purely psychological, caused by fear, but some witnesses appear to have noted these effects as the first indication that something unusual was going to happen. A number of examples of reddened skin, skin heated, and some examples of burns very few municipalities are in the files. These physiological effects are sufficiently different to the need to be careful in trying to generalize. Curiously, dizziness and paralysis particular seem to be reported more widely than any other physiological effects. A person who is almost unaware of the ramifications of the UFO evidence may find the idea absurd to say that people were paralyzed in the vicinity of UFOs, the skeptic might find inconceivable that such cases go unnoticed publications of the press and medical literature. It is the contrary, I am sorry to say, on the basis of my own investigations. I have encountered cases where serious injuries were suffered, and where the obvious risks of damage were involved, yet the witness and his family have found the jokes so much more numerous than the sympathy they had wisest d ' quietly forget the whole thing. In a first step of my investigation I would have considered it as quite incredible; Investigators UFO with a longer experience than mine smile to the report, but they probably smile with a certain understanding. I could cite specific examples to make good of light over there, but I omets for reasons of space limited, however, making a few remarks on this subject in the next section.